• Canon 14mm 2.8L
• Canon TS-E 24

I currently use the 16-35mm 2.8 II for all of my real estate photography, mounted on a full frame sensor.  Therefore I was very curious to see what the 14mm can do as well as the tilt effect of the TS-E 24.  The following shot used the 16-35.

Here is the comparison shot with the 14mm (first version).

As you can see, the 14mm does make a difference.  While the window on the right roughly lines up on the edge, with the 14mm you can see a bit of the bathroom.  The verticals are better on the 16mm shot, but that is due to camera position, not due to the lens.

Based on this result, I liked the 14mm but not enough to justify its price.  Perhaps if I were faced with a very large interior this would be the lens of choice, but for real estate photography I don’t think it’s worth it.

I also played a bit with the TS-E 24, though I don’t have the shots here.  I do think that I will purchase this lens someday but it’s mainly useful for outside shots – such as the front of the house.

The main problem is it is not wide enough.  I really like the width of the 16-35 at the wide end, though I do like the perspective correction with the TS-E 24.  I did play around with it with taking pictures with a mirror in the bathroom.  Supposedly it helps quite a bit taking pictures in rooms with a lot of mirrors – so you don’t wind up in one of the shots.  I found that the shift does help – but it is not a miracle maker.

Therefore I do plan to buy the TS-E 24 someday, but I’m not sure where it ranks in my current list of things to purchase.  For sure it ranks below buying an Alienbees light.

No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.