Recently I pondered a bit how to break the 5x barrier in terms of macro magnification. While my MP-E 65 provides magnification up to 5x, of course I had to wonder about progressing beyond this. I read a bit about using bellows, reversing lenses, and other techniques, but all of them seemed rather a pain. For instance, bellows really aren’t practical when photographing out in the field.
It then occurred to me that the answer was quite obvious. First, by switching to my 7D instead of my 5D2 I reached an effective magnification (compared to my 5D2) of 8x. Second, I was curious if my 1.4x extender would work with the MP-E 65 – so I fit it on to give me an effective magnification of 11x. I decided to ignore the inevitable diffraction and try it out.
After trying it out on the carpet, I decided to find a real subject so I went outside with my contraption. I quickly found a fly that was temporarily willing to be a still subject – or at least up to 3x when it flew away.
Continue Reading…
Posted 2 years, 1 month ago at 3:30 am. Add a comment
As some of you may know, I have been eyeing a large telephoto for quite some time. I have long agonized when I will finally purchase my large telephoto and which one will I buy. Will I buy the more portable 500mm F4 or the longer but heavier 600mm F4? Perhaps I will go all out and spring for the 800mm 5.6, or perhaps I will go the sports route and get the 400mm 2.8? I have spent a great deal of time debating this and bugging others about it.
This weekend, though, I decided to do something a bit different. Given a home I had to photograph in Monroe, I decided to take a trip to Ben Hierland’s Wildlife Park. I took along my 100-400 and my 7D and used my monopod for stabilization. I’ve had my 7D for a good month now, but this was the first time I had actually used it for wildlife. The idea was that the crop factor should give me a good idea what magnification I truly needed and which lens would work the best for me.
I must say I was completely shocked at what the answer turned out to be.
Continue Reading…
Posted 2 years, 1 month ago at 5:17 am. 1 comment
I admit it. I am an equipment junkie. I want all of the best photo equipment and lenses no matter how much they cost and I love showing my equipment off. In particular I love hearing now that’s a camera, as people walk by.
You know that you are the same, so it’s best to admit it now and get it over with! Therefore, with that spirit in mind I will discuss the gear that I currently use.
Camera:
Canon 5D Mark II – I really like this camera and have already discussed it at great length on this blog.
Lenses:
Canon 70-200 4L IS – This is my walk around lens and the lens I most commonly use for shots of my kids. I bought it over the 2.8 because it is much lighter and the IS is better.
Canon MP-E 65 – This is the lens I use for the majority of my insect shots.
Canon 180L Macro – I use this less often than my MP-E 65, but it is my main lens for larger insects and flowers.
Canon 16-35 2.8L II – This is the main lens I use for real estate and for landscape shots while traveling.
Canon 50mm 1.4 – I rarely use this lens, but it does come in handy for low light situations.
Canon 100-400 4.5-5.6L – This is my zoo and wildlife lens.
Lighting:
Canon 580EX – This is the first flash I bought and I still prefer it in some ways to the 580EX II, which sometimes has difficulties with the Pocketwizards.
Canon 580EX II – It’s nice to control the flash from the camera, but otherwise it is no big upgrade.
Canon MT-24EX – This is the flash I use for most of my macro shots.
Pocketwizard MultiMAX – I love the added versatility over the Pocketwizard Plus II, but I rarely use multiple lights in my shots these days.
Other:
Really Right Stuff L Bracket – IMHO their L brackets are the best.
Gitzo 1348 tripod – The tripod is a bit big, but is extremely sturdy. It is great for real estate and for around town, but not so great for traveling.
Markins M20 head – Great head for less price than the Really Right Stuff head.
Gitzo GM-5561 monopod – Expensive but amazingly small and strong for a monopod. I almost always have this on me.
Really Right Stuff Tilt head – Works great when tracking birds or other things.
Kirk Macro Rail – I shoot most of my macro shots handheld so I now use this mainly for panorama shots – to adjust the nodal point of the lens. It’s not a bad macro rail but I would probably buy the Really Right Stuff one if I had to do it over again.
Lumiquest 80/20 system – I almost always have this on my flash.
Wimberley macro brackets – When I am using a flash with my 180L, these are always on. I also use them for drop shots.
In my next post I will cover the gear I hope to get.
Posted 3 years, 1 month ago at 12:36 pm. 2 comments
Recently it has been a bit of a bummer being a Canon user. Granted, the 5D Mark II is a great camera and competes very well with the D700, but every other camera in their SLR line seems to take a back seat these days.
Therefore it was nice to see Canon still has a bit of ingenuity up their sleaves in the TS-E 17 F4 lens. One area where Canon still has an advantage over Nikon is in their lenses. Canon simply has far more lenses and far more good primes specifically. Nikon has a few lenses Canon doesn’t – such as the 14-24 and the 200-400, but the Canon lenses I use most often – the 70-200/4 IS and the MP-E 65 – have no equivalents in Nikon.
Still, Canon has the tendency lately to sit back on their laurels and let Nikon catch up. That is what happened with high ISO capabilities and I expected the same to occur for lenses – where Canon’s strategy lately has been to upgrade existing lenses.
This is not the case with the TS-E 17 – which is the ultimate interior photography lens. Already I am salivating at the thought of taking real estate pictures with this lens – though I’m having more than a little trouble convincing my wife that it is worth it!
I had planned to buy the TS-E 24 at some time, but I wasn’t crazy about it. I had heard that the lens was not great optically and 24mm is a great distance from my 16-35 that I normally use. I did use a friend’s TS-E 24 briefly in a house I photographed, but I put the lens away because I needed something much wider. The TS-E 17 fits the bill exactly.
I hope that this is a sign for the future – that Canon will keep innovating. They now have another lens with no equivalent in other systems and I suspect a good number of interior photographers will buy a Canon camera if they are not using one just to be able to use this lens.
Now if I can just figure out where to get $2500.
Posted 3 years, 2 months ago at 1:51 pm. Add a comment
As many of you know, I am not into taking pictures of people other than my kids. I have never taken a fashion shot and likely never will. A lot of it is that I find these pictures very fake. I am just not a “look at me” kind of person and do not like others who are.
Still, events I find quite different. The pictures serve a higher purpose than just “look at me” and are a way for those in the picture to remember events for years later. Therefore, when asked I often bring my camera to these events. Still, I had never been asked to bring my camera to a wedding.
Recently, some friends of ours who were not able to hire a professional wedding photographer asked if I could take pictures. I obliged and tried to do the best job possible. In the process, I think some things worked well and some things not so well. Here are several of the shots (note: I did not do any post processing).
Continue Reading…
Posted 3 years, 3 months ago at 1:42 pm. Add a comment
I am a very biased and opinionated person on all subjects I care about – so it is especially true for photography. I really have not published a ‘beginners photography’ blog because there are so many of them out there already. However, after seeing a number that I sharply disagree with, I thought I would post my own.
I will not talk about specific camera models or Nikon vs. Canon here. This is for those who want to become photographers – not equipment collectors. Therefore, the following are my recommendations for people who want to get into photography.
What should I do first?
This is simple, do not buy anything? Huh!? Before buying any equipment, I strongly recommend you go to the bookstore/library and get one or two books on the type of photography you are interested in. I do not recommend the general photography books as those aren’t very helpful. Get books from photographers known for their work. The book I started out with is John Shaw’s Nature Photography Field Guide
– though if you’re into portrait photography you’ll probably want a different book.
The point is you need to understand some things before you buy. Unless you understand what an SLR does for you and what the differences are between different lenses, you’ll be unlikely to make an informed decision.
Continue Reading…
Posted 3 years, 4 months ago at 1:28 pm. 3 comments
Before I begin speculating, let me first state very clearly that I have absolutely no inside knowledge of what Canon will release next year. These are just educated guesses. However, it can be fun to guess.
To be honest, recent lens releases by Canon have been extremely dull. I was completely underwhelmed with the recently announced 24mm 1.4 II as I really have absolutely no use for a lens like that. My suspicions are that this trend will continue for next year.
There are two main reasons why I think Canon will not release many new lenses next year.
- Canon doesn’t really need to do this. Canon already has a good lead over Nikon in terms of lens variety and Nikon has been releasing lenses at a slow pace itself. With cameras, I have noticed that Canon seemed to prefer to let Nikon catch up to them before releasing anything new. To a lesser degree, that may be the same case with lenses.
- We are in an economic downturn. Most companies I know of have cut features from their products and reduced the number of products in development. Canon (and Nikon) are no different here. If Canon releases more lenses next year than it did this year, the only reason will be that these lenses were already very mature in development.
That being said, the following are my opinions on upcoming lenses. Rather than state what I think will be released compared to what will not, I will rank them from one to ten with one meaning the chances are very low to ten being an almost certainty.
Continue Reading…
Posted 3 years, 5 months ago at 3:59 am. 3 comments
Sometime ago I had the opportunity to take a once in a lifetime trek to Manu National Park in Peru. At the time, I only had a P&S Sony Cybershot 717. However, now that I know more about photography, I thought I would share with you what I would take if money were no object and if I decided to return to Manu – which I certainly hope to do someday.
First, I will divide the trip into the different types of photos you may take – landscape, wildlife, and macro.
Continue Reading…
Posted 3 years, 5 months ago at 3:06 am. 1 comment
Recently I lent my MP-E 65 macro lens to two colleagues at work. Both are very good photographers but had never used this lens before. Interestingly, neither one was able to come up with decent shots from the lens.
Comments that I heard were
“I just don’t have that much patience.”
“I took a number of shots, but they all came out blurry”

I feel like some sort of zen master, when I prognose that the reason that they failed to take good shots had nothing to do with their photography skills (they’re both better than I), but that they were unable to find their inner peace to use the lens correctly.
Continue Reading…
Posted 3 years, 7 months ago at 1:12 pm. 1 comment
A number of people have asked me about the sharpness of the Canon 180L. In general, I find this to be a very sharp lens but that doesn’t help very much. Therefore, I decided to try a little test. Unfortunately, given that I do not have a tremendous amount of time, I was not able to take pictures specifically for this test. Luckily, though, I had some pictures that were of similar subjects taken with both lenses.
Both shots were taken with the MT-24EX mounted and were at 1/200 second at apertures of f/11. The camera used was the Canon 5D. One shot was taken with the 180L while the other was taken with the MP-E 65. With both shots, I took a number of the same subject so I then took the best representative shot from each set. The following are the two test shots.
I hope it is obvious which shot was taken with the 180L and which was taken with the MP-E 65.
Continue Reading…
Posted 3 years, 7 months ago at 2:32 pm. 2 comments