<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CalevPhoto &#187; high</title>
	<atom:link href="http://calevphoto.com/tag/high/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://calevphoto.com</link>
	<description>Photographing the Earth, one millimeter at a time…</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 05:49:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Using flash above 1/200</title>
		<link>http://calevphoto.com/2009/01/07/using-flash-above-1200/</link>
		<comments>http://calevphoto.com/2009/01/07/using-flash-above-1200/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 13:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sync]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calevphoto.com/2009/01/07/using-flash-above-1200/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently while taking some drop photos, I wondered whether I could increase the shutter speed past 1/200.  With high speed sync, I often took pictures at 1/250 and 1/300 &#8211; but I wanted to see if I could exceed it. I had thought a bit about using a PocketWizard MultiMAX, but after reading through the [...]


No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently while taking some <a href="http://calevphoto.com/2009/01/02/playing-with-drips-and-drops/" target="_blank">drop photos</a>, I wondered whether I could increase the shutter speed past 1/200.  With high speed sync, I often took pictures at 1/250 and 1/300 &#8211; but I wanted to see if I could exceed it.</p>
<p>I had thought a bit about using a <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/221277-REG/PocketWizard_802_450_MultiMax_32_Channel_Transceiver.html/BI/2914/KBID/3857" target="_blank">PocketWizard MultiMAX</a>, but after reading through the manual and reading about others&#8217; experiences, it doesn&#8217;t seem that it can get me much past 1/300.  Therefore I came up with a rather simple idea that amazingly worked.</p>
<p>I setup my <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/239656-USA/Canon_2357A002_MT_24EX_Macro_Twin_Lite.html/BI/2914/KBID/3857" target="_blank">MT-24EX</a> on my <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/112541-USA/Canon_2539A007_Telephoto_EF_180mm_f_3_5L.html/BI/2914/KBID/3857" target="_blank">180L</a> and used it to trigger to 580EX flashes.  The MT-24EX was set as the master and both 580EX flashes (actually one 580EX and one 580EX II) were set as slaves.  I placed both 580EX flashes on the end of Wimberley macro brackets &#8211; which held the weight fine.  I then set the MT-24EX to high speed sync.</p>
<p>The entire camera loaded thus was quite heavy and large.  I suspect in the field it wouldn&#8217;t be too practical &#8211; though a monopod may help things.  My goal was basically to blast the subject with light.  Since I was watching the kids at home that day, I couldn&#8217;t go outside to try with a live drop so I hooked up the hose on the faucet with a rubber band.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/kirispupis/3161424974/" target="_blank"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3262/3161424974_234c72cf82_o.jpg" alt="" /></a></p>
<p><span id="more-496"></span></p>
<p>In one respect, this shot was actually a mistake.  I normally keep my ISO at automatic &#8211; but I had been taking some video the day before and therefore it was set to tungsten.  When I switched to auto-ISO, I got the following shot.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/kirispupis/3161425062/" target="_blank"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3098/3161425062_982071c635_o.jpg" alt="" /></a></p>
<p>The only real difference between the shots (other than a bit better focus on the first one) is white balance.  In my opinion, the &#8216;mistake&#8217; looks much better than the shot I normally would have gotten.  Therefore I need to take note to try out different white balances on my RAW photos from time to time.  Here, the tungsten white balance does a great effect on the water.</p>
<p>In terms of the result of my experiment, I was able to get shots at up to 1/2000 of a second by blasting the subject with light from the three flashes and four heads (the MT-24EX has two heads).  I haven&#8217;t quite figured out how to use this in a more practical situation, but I&#8217;m happy to know that there is a relatively simple way to exceed 1/200 when I need it.</p>
<p>Note that this won&#8217;t help much with non-macro shots.  The further you get the flash away the less effective it becomes.  The main reason this approach seems to work here is that I blasted a rather small subject with a large amount of light.</p>
<p>As an aside, I found that leaving the faucet up with the rubber band attached makes a great joke.  No one expects when they turn on the faucet to get sprayed!</p>


<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://calevphoto.com/2009/01/07/using-flash-above-1200/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

