Rss Feed
Tweeter button
Facebook button
Technorati button
Reddit button
Myspace button
Webonews button
Delicious button
Digg button
Stumbleupon button
Newsvine button

CalevPhoto

Photographing the Earth, one millimeter at a time…

Kids cameras VTech vs Fisher Price

Recently I answered a question about the best camera for a young child, and since my kids have owned the two most popular models on the market today, I thought I would give our experiences with both of them for those who are interested.

The two primary cameras for young children today are the following.  Please note that by ordering through these links you are helping to support this site.

 

Note that these are really just two cameras.  Each camera comes in either pink or blue.  Both cameras have been updated recently – but the update is strictly to add more megapixels to the existing cameras.  Everything else about them hasn’t changed.

We gave the Fisher Price camera to our older son when he was three years old.  He used that until losing it in Jerusalem, after which we replaced it with the VTech.

The Fisher Price is a more basic camera, but we felt that it took more high quality pictures.  Here is a shot that Eitan took with it while in Thailand.

The pictures are of a decent quality and generally it exposes quite well.  Here’s a shot he took indoors of his brother.

The camera is really no frills.  It does not have a zoom, the flash cannot be turned off, and obviously the exposure cannot be overridden.  However, for a young child it is extremely easy to use.  It is also practically indestructible as it did go flying on several occasions.

Eitan absolutely loved the camera and was heartbroken when he lost it.  Rather than buying the same camera, I decided to buy the VTech due to the higher megapixel count and the fact that it has video.

The VTech isn’t as good when it comes to pictures.  Although it has more megapixels than the Fisher Price, the optical quality isn’t as good and the exposure is often wrong – particularly when the flash fires.

Here’s an example shot from the VTech.  In general we have noticed far fewer ‘keepers’ from this camera.

DC00005

You can see that the quality isn’t nearly as good as the Fisher Price, despite the fact that it has a higher number of megapixels.

The VTech does have the advantage that it supports video and has games on it.  For awhile Eitan played these games a lot.  In fact, I think he has used it more for the games than for pictures or video.

For video though, it can be quite funny seeing what happens when a hyperactive kid takes it out for a spin.  He took this video when we weren’t watching. (Note: if for some reason the video does not appear here you can also view it at http://www.flickr.com/photos/kirispupis/2993531665/)

He played around with the video for a bit, but no longer uses it.

Recently, Eitan has stopped using the camera completely because it doesn’t zoom.  Currently I help him take pictures with my camera, which he loves to do.  I have been eyeing buying him the Olympus SW1030, which is rugged enough for his age but is a bit high for our budget right now.

However, between the Fisher Price and the VTech kids cameras, in my opinion (and Eitan’s) the Fisher Price is the clear winner.  The VTech has more features and a higher resolution, but the Fisher Price is much easier to use and takes better quality shots.

Posted 3 years, 3 months ago at 1:13 pm.

5 comments

My thoughts on the Canon 40D

Recently, one of my friends felt pity for my cameraless plight and let me borrow his 40D over the weekend so I could take pictures of my sons at two Halloween parties.

Coming from the 5D, the 40D is certainly a different camera.  I suspect that many people right now are trying to make up their mind whether to purchase a new 50D or a used 5D, so I thought I would offer my opinions on the differences (the 50D and 40D are very similar cameras).

Continue Reading…

Posted 3 years, 3 months ago at 4:40 pm.

2 comments

Canon 500D or Macro Lens

On a recent post I received a question over how the Canon 500D diopter compares with a true macro lens.  When I first bought my camera, I knew I wanted to do macro but I didn’t have the money for a true macro lens.  I wound up purchasing the Sigma 80-400 4.5-5.6 OS lens along with the 500D diopter.  I quickly fell in love with macro photography and saved up for a true macro lens and once I had one I eventually sold the 500D.  The following is a shot I took with the 500D when visiting the zoo with my kids.

However, let’s get more specific on the differences between a diopter and a true macro lens.

Continue Reading…

Posted 3 years, 4 months ago at 12:19 am.

Add a comment

The 180L vs MP-E 65 Sharpness Test

A number of people have asked me about the sharpness of the Canon 180L.  In general, I find this to be a very sharp lens but that doesn’t help very much.  Therefore, I decided to try a little test.  Unfortunately, given that I do not have a tremendous amount of time, I was not able to take pictures specifically for this test.  Luckily, though, I had some pictures that were of similar subjects taken with both lenses.

Both shots were taken with the MT-24EX mounted and were at 1/200 second at apertures of f/11.  The camera used was the Canon 5D.  One shot was taken with the 180L while the other was taken with the MP-E 65.  With both shots, I took a number of the same subject so I then took the best representative shot from each set.  The following are the two test shots.

I hope it is obvious which shot was taken with the 180L and which was taken with the MP-E 65.

Continue Reading…

Posted 3 years, 4 months ago at 2:32 pm.

2 comments