<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CalevPhoto &#187; 40D</title>
	<atom:link href="http://calevphoto.com/tag/40d/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://calevphoto.com</link>
	<description>Photographing the Earth, one millimeter at a time…</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 05:49:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>My thoughts on the Canon 40D</title>
		<link>http://calevphoto.com/2008/10/26/my-thoughts-on-the-canon-40d/</link>
		<comments>http://calevphoto.com/2008/10/26/my-thoughts-on-the-canon-40d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 16:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[40D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[5d]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calevphoto.com/2008/10/26/my-thoughts-on-the-canon-40d/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently, one of my friends felt pity for my cameraless plight and let me borrow his 40D over the weekend so I could take pictures of my sons at two Halloween parties. Coming from the 5D, the 40D is certainly a different camera.&#160; I suspect that many people right now are trying to make up [...]


No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently, one of my friends felt pity for my cameraless plight and let me borrow his 40D over the weekend so I could take pictures of my sons at two Halloween parties.</p>
<p>Coming from the 5D, the 40D is certainly a different camera.&nbsp; I suspect that many people right now are trying to make up their mind whether to purchase a new 50D or a used 5D, so I thought I would offer my opinions on the differences (the 50D and 40D are very similar cameras).</p>
<p><span id="more-428"></span>
<p>First, I am not going to dwell on the well known aspects such as image quality and noise.&nbsp; There are many well respected web sites out there that will go into detail for these cameras.&nbsp; In general, though, I felt the 40D was a very good camera.&nbsp; Knowing that its high ISO capabilities are not as strong as the 5D, I didn&#8217;t push it very much.&nbsp; On a few occasions I went up to ISO 800, but generally tried to keep it as low as possible.</p>
<p>As the 40D is a new camera, it has a number of improvements over the 5D.&nbsp; The following are my impressions of them.</p>
<p><strong>Dust removal</strong> &#8211; As with all newer Canon cameras, the 40D has automatic dust removal.&nbsp; I tested this by taking some shots with my <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/183199-USA/Canon_2540A002_Macro_Photo_MP_E_65mm.html/BI/2914/KBID/3857" target="_blank">MP-E 65</a>, which is the king of all lenses when it comes to showing dust.&nbsp; I did find significantly less dust than I am accustomed to, particularly in the corners.&nbsp; However, the images were certainly not dust free, and I will still have some cloning work to do.&nbsp; The dust removal feature does reduce the amount of cloning I need to do though.</p>
<p><strong>LCD</strong> &#8211; The 40D has a much nicer LCD than my 5D.&nbsp; This helped significantly when making decisions about which images to keep.&nbsp; I suspect with zoom I could have a good indication of how in focus an image is, but I didn&#8217;t have time for that.&nbsp; Still, images I thought were in focus on the viewfinder turned out to be out of focus when I downloaded them.&nbsp; I suspect the viewfinder on the <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/583953-REG/Canon_2764B003_EOS_5D_Mark_II.html/BI/2914/KBID/3857" target="_blank">5D Mark II</a> will be an improvement here.</p>
<p><strong>Live View</strong> &#8211; I didn&#8217;t use this feature at all, and suspect I won&#8217;t use it much on the 5D Mark II except for the taking movies.&nbsp; The MP-E 65 requires eye coordination and Live View is basically useless in this aspect.&nbsp; When taking pictures of the kids, I felt it was unnecessary.</p>
<p><strong>Viewfinder</strong> &#8211; Displaying the ISO in the viewfinder was very helpful.</p>
<p><strong>Bursts</strong> &#8211; the 40D has a much higher frames per second than the 5D. In practice, I didn&#8217;t really use this.&nbsp; My preferred style is to anticipate the moment, then take the shot.&nbsp; I never pushed my old 5D in terms of burst and didn&#8217;t come close to using the feature for the 40D.</p>
<p><strong>Autofocus</strong> &#8211; This is very hard to quantify, but based on the results I believe the AF in the original 5D is better.&nbsp; In similar settings and lighting conditions I have had more &#8216;keeper&#8217; shots, despite the fact that I used the same settings.</p>
<p><strong>Feel</strong> &#8211; The 5D is certainly a larger camera and &#8216;feels&#8217; more professional.&nbsp; Perhaps it is just my familiarity with the 5D, but it feels much better in my hands.</p>
<p><strong>Crop factor</strong> &#8211; This was very welcome when taking macro shots and when using my telephoto lens.&nbsp; It was of course unwelcome when using my wide angle lens.&nbsp; In general though I didn&#8217;t feel that I got any shots I wouldn&#8217;t have gotten with my 5D.&nbsp; The depth of field was also a bit nicer in the macro shots, as the 40D has a bit more than the 5D.&nbsp; Still, my style is to generally blur the background a bit, which is more difficult when you have more DOF.</p>
<p><strong>Pop up flash</strong> &#8211; I used hot shoe flashes whenever necessary, but Nelya used the pop up flash.&nbsp; I offered to put one of my flashes on the camera, but she didn&#8217;t want to bother.&nbsp; In my opinion, the shots show the effect of a weak uni-directional flash &#8211; all the more reason that I prefer to not have a pop up flash on my camera.</p>
<p><strong>Wife&#8217;s opinion</strong> &#8211; Nelya actually used the camera for the first party as I volunteered to help with the event.&nbsp; She didn&#8217;t like the camera at all &#8211; saying that it felt more like a &#8216;toy&#8217; compared to my old camera.</p>
<p>In general I think the 40D is a great camera.&nbsp; When choosing between an old 5D and the newer 50D (which is essentially the 40D with a better LCD and 50% more pixels), I would choose the 5D simply because I prefer having less DOF and I like the feel of the camera more.&nbsp; For purely macro and telephoto reasons though, the 50D certainly has its advantages.</p>


<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://calevphoto.com/2008/10/26/my-thoughts-on-the-canon-40d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

