I think almost everyone in the world is familiar with the sand dollar so often found on the beach. Until recently, I always believed that all sand dollars were white. I must admit that I thought that the actual animal lived inside of the white shell and that birds would open it up to eat it.
In truth, sand dollars look quite a bit different when they are still alive.

These two sand dollars were found at Kopachuk State Park, where it’s literally impossible to not find a sand dollar. They can be found in the thousands there and in places it is difficult to walk without stepping on one.
This one appears to be Echinarachnius parma, or the Common Sand Dollar. Interestingly, sand dollars are either female or male – just like other animals and insects. Even more interestingly, sand dollars are one of the first creatures found to use cloning as a means for self defense. The sand dollar will deliberately break of parts of itself that are small enough for predators to not bother them.
Taking a look at the sand dollars on the beach, it was very clear upon looking at them that they are truly living – as it appeared something was moving on them. Of course I had to take a closer look.
Continue Reading…
Posted 1 year, 9 months ago at 3:51 am. 1 comment
Here in the Pacific Northwest, the harvestman is one of the coolest and easiest critters to find. At the ponds by my office, they are very common and I see one almost every time I photograph there. I have a number of pictures of them, but I decided to play around a bit more this time to see if I could be a bit more original.

My goal with this shot was to emphasize the legs coming right out at you – as if they harvestman were about to grab you. I created several versions of this shot, but this one I like the best – with the body of the harvestman just visible behind.
For those not familiar with our friend the harvestman, they are not spiders. They are arachnids, but are in the order Opiliones while spiders are in the order Araneae. Of course, for the squeamish that isn’t very important. Most people know the harvestman by the common name “daddy long legs".
Continue Reading…
Posted 1 year, 9 months ago at 5:21 am. 1 comment
After last weekend’s disastrous effort in birding, I decided to get back to my good old macro shots when I went for a stroll by several ponds near my office. The day’s efforts were OK – as I found several flies mating that I will need to later identify. After getting some decent shots, I packed up my camera and started to head back.
Not far from being back in my office I suddenly heard several loud knocks as a I passed a tree. I’m not a birder, but neither am I an idiot. I immediately knew what that could be. After several moments, I located the culprit.

I must admit that I had to look up what type of woodpecker this is, and it is a Northern Flicker. It is actually quite common everywhere in the US and I’m sure for many birders this is a rather ordinary bird – but for me at least this is the best look I have had of a woodpecker.
Continue Reading…
Posted 1 year, 9 months ago at 4:03 am. Add a comment
Recently I pondered a bit how to break the 5x barrier in terms of macro magnification. While my MP-E 65 provides magnification up to 5x, of course I had to wonder about progressing beyond this. I read a bit about using bellows, reversing lenses, and other techniques, but all of them seemed rather a pain. For instance, bellows really aren’t practical when photographing out in the field.
It then occurred to me that the answer was quite obvious. First, by switching to my 7D instead of my 5D2 I reached an effective magnification (compared to my 5D2) of 8x. Second, I was curious if my 1.4x extender would work with the MP-E 65 – so I fit it on to give me an effective magnification of 11x. I decided to ignore the inevitable diffraction and try it out.
After trying it out on the carpet, I decided to find a real subject so I went outside with my contraption. I quickly found a fly that was temporarily willing to be a still subject – or at least up to 3x when it flew away.
Continue Reading…
Posted 1 year, 9 months ago at 3:30 am. Add a comment
As some of you may know, I have been eyeing a large telephoto for quite some time. I have long agonized when I will finally purchase my large telephoto and which one will I buy. Will I buy the more portable 500mm F4 or the longer but heavier 600mm F4? Perhaps I will go all out and spring for the 800mm 5.6, or perhaps I will go the sports route and get the 400mm 2.8? I have spent a great deal of time debating this and bugging others about it.
This weekend, though, I decided to do something a bit different. Given a home I had to photograph in Monroe, I decided to take a trip to Ben Hierland’s Wildlife Park. I took along my 100-400 and my 7D and used my monopod for stabilization. I’ve had my 7D for a good month now, but this was the first time I had actually used it for wildlife. The idea was that the crop factor should give me a good idea what magnification I truly needed and which lens would work the best for me.
I must say I was completely shocked at what the answer turned out to be.
Continue Reading…
Posted 1 year, 9 months ago at 5:17 am. 1 comment

There has recently been a growing chatter about the rise of the amateur photographer and the threat this poses to professional photographers making a living today. The claim goes that, since these photographers offer their photos for free or for pennies on the dollar, true professional photographers can no longer make a living.
This argument has grown quite heated at times. One the one side, you have professional photographers trying to convince good amateur photographers to sell their photos for a good rate. On the other side you have amateur photographers complaining that professional photographers are trying to control the market.
There is no denying that the market has changed. Places like Shutterstock and IStockphoto have certainly changed the equation and people on FlickR giving their photos away for free are also changing it. Journalism has also significantly changed, meaning many once employed photographers are now looking for jobs as newspapers fold and news organizations look for amateur photographers on the ground.
However, just because the market changed does not mean professional photography is going the way of the dodo – far from it.
Continue Reading…
Posted 1 year, 10 months ago at 4:04 pm. 1 comment
I remember as a (slightly abnormal) kid collecting firecracker packs having a pack called ‘Mighty Mite’. At the time, it never really occurred to me what a ‘mite’ was – I just collected the pack.
It isn’t difficult to find mites whenever taking macro shots. They are everywhere and you really just have to turn over a leaf that is decaying on the ground to find one. Photographing one, though. Well that’s a different story.

Complicating getting a good photo of one of these little buggers are two things.
1) They are extremely small. The shot above was taken at 5x – and even then I cropped it.
2) They move rather quickly and do not sit still
About a week ago, though, after not finding much anything else to photograph that day, I decided to take my chances.
Continue Reading…
Posted 1 year, 10 months ago at 5:22 am. Add a comment
Well, not quite. However, consider the common perception that a) lizards most like places that are hot and sunny and b) Seattle is pretty much the exact opposite of hot and sunny – and you can picture my surprise when one of my kids picked up a rock and out popped a lizard!

This particular lizard was found in the backyard of a property Nelya was listing. We all travelled to a small town called Olalla in Kitsap County to take pictures of the listing. The weather was great, but unfortunately the property was not clean enough to take pictures. Bummer.
However, since it was a nice day we decided to take photos of the outside at least, and my kids were playing in the backyard when they happened across this little guy (or gal).
Continue Reading…
Posted 1 year, 10 months ago at 5:26 am. Add a comment
Lately, I haven’t done much with this blog because I have had difficulties determining what its actual purpose is. Day after day of blogs discussing some particular insect I ran across – when most of these insects were the same as ones before – became rather tiresome. I suspect this was tiresome not just on me – but also on those who read this blog.
I had some decisions to make.
At various times, I considered turning this into more of a review blog. The idea was to review various pieces of equipment and books and then get a cut when someone ordered something from my links. I did post several of these blogs, but came to realize something very quickly. Those who are well known for writing about photography are generally not well known for their photography itself. In other words, the more one writes reviews about lenses and other equipment, the less one progresses as a photographer.
I also thought about using this as a stage for my best photography. This can get rather boring too though. Hey! Look at this! Some pictures are better than others and some I do want to show off, but I want this to be an entertaining blog – not one where I attempt to stuff my photos down your throat.
So what type of blog will this be? My goal is for it to be an entertaining one.
I must admit that the implementation of this idea is not entirely set. I do have some ideas which I will begin to implement very soon, but my hope is that those who do read this blog find it entertaining.
While I will no longer provide any equipment or book reviews here, that doesn’t mean this blog will not teach something. I do hope to teach others about the nature around us and other things, but I also plan to do this in a manner that is not tediously boring.
I apologize for being vague here and ‘pardon the dust’. Rather than explain this further, I think it is best to begin showing you…
Posted 1 year, 10 months ago at 5:58 pm. Add a comment
After much thought and deliberation, I have decided to move to medium format and sell all of my Canon equipment. The truth is I need to improve my range as a photographer and moving to medium format is the best way to do that. I also have the desire to move into professional gigs where a MF camera is basically a requirement.
The problem with Canon SLRs, as most of you already know, is they keep bumping up the megapixels while ignoring the optical limits. The gain in resolution between camera models is negligible. The problem is, megapixels are important, so long as they actually lead to an improvement in quality. Therefore, Nikon was completely out as their decision to keep cameras in the low megapixels (sans the D3x which has the same issue as the Canons) doesn’t help me at all.
The breakthrough came just yesterday, when – after some length of discussions – I convinced someone to sell me his digital Hasselblad gear for a good price. The camera and lenses are all extremely new. The guy was forced to sell them due to mounting debt and a house in foreclosure, so after having a difficult time selling them he finally agreed to sell them to me for a price that was too good to turn down. However, to now finance this purchase I need to sell all of my Canon gear.
What does this mean in terms of my photographs?
Well, now that I have truly pro equipment you will see my photos get significantly better. Don’t listen to those other blogs out there. Better equipment does make you a better photographer.
This also means that I will cease producing many of my super close insect shots. I’m bored of insects and it is time to move on. I did purchase a macro lens in the group though, so larger insects are still possible if I desire to turn back – and at 50MP I can crop quite a bit.
I’ll likely start including more portraiture on this blog and people photos as well.
For those interested in purchasing some of my Canon equipment – including a 5D2, 7D, TS-E 17, TS-E 24 II, 70-200 4L IS, 100-400, 16-35 II, and other things, click the ‘read more’ link to view the full blog.
Continue Reading…
Posted 1 year, 10 months ago at 2:16 pm. Add a comment