<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What lenses will Canon release next year?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://calevphoto.com/2008/12/02/what-lenses-will-canon-release-next-year/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://calevphoto.com/2008/12/02/what-lenses-will-canon-release-next-year/</link>
	<description>Photographing the Earth, one millimeter at a time…</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 04:55:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Calevphoto</title>
		<link>http://calevphoto.com/2008/12/02/what-lenses-will-canon-release-next-year/comment-page-1/#comment-662</link>
		<dc:creator>Calevphoto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 16:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calevphoto.com/2008/12/02/what-lenses-will-canon-release-next-year/#comment-662</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m really sick of the knocks on the 16-35.  This is a very good lens and on vacations is my most used lens.  These &quot;professional reviewers&quot; that review it are nothing more than pixel peepers. There are a large number of true pros that lean on this lens often.

The Nikon 14-24 is certainly a very good lens, but I doubt that Canon has any plans in the near future to match it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m really sick of the knocks on the 16-35.  This is a very good lens and on vacations is my most used lens.  These &#8220;professional reviewers&#8221; that review it are nothing more than pixel peepers. There are a large number of true pros that lean on this lens often.</p>
<p>The Nikon 14-24 is certainly a very good lens, but I doubt that Canon has any plans in the near future to match it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Giorgio</title>
		<link>http://calevphoto.com/2008/12/02/what-lenses-will-canon-release-next-year/comment-page-1/#comment-659</link>
		<dc:creator>Giorgio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 14:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calevphoto.com/2008/12/02/what-lenses-will-canon-release-next-year/#comment-659</guid>
		<description>I only agree with the idea that&#039;s not the right moment  (due to economic downturn)  for Canon to present new lenses, but It seems realistic that Canon will present a new 14-24 f=2.8 L in order to react to the shock caused by the launch of  the &quot;almost impossible&quot;14-24 Nikon. It&#039;s evident that the new Canon 16-35 II is considered &quot;not so good as expected&quot; by professional reviewers, So Canon tried to offer it discounted in various countries, but sales remained almost the same. . I think this new lens would be presented in autumn  2010.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I only agree with the idea that&#8217;s not the right moment  (due to economic downturn)  for Canon to present new lenses, but It seems realistic that Canon will present a new 14-24 f=2.8 L in order to react to the shock caused by the launch of  the &#8220;almost impossible&#8221;14-24 Nikon. It&#8217;s evident that the new Canon 16-35 II is considered &#8220;not so good as expected&#8221; by professional reviewers, So Canon tried to offer it discounted in various countries, but sales remained almost the same. . I think this new lens would be presented in autumn  2010.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://calevphoto.com/2008/12/02/what-lenses-will-canon-release-next-year/comment-page-1/#comment-475</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 16:51:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calevphoto.com/2008/12/02/what-lenses-will-canon-release-next-year/#comment-475</guid>
		<description>If someone, anyone would release a good wide-angle macro I&#039;ll be first in line.  Heck, I&#039;d even switch to Nikon for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If someone, anyone would release a good wide-angle macro I&#8217;ll be first in line.  Heck, I&#8217;d even switch to Nikon for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

