Rss Feed
Tweeter button
Facebook button
Technorati button
Reddit button
Myspace button
Linkedin button
Webonews button
Delicious button
Digg button
Flickr button
Stumbleupon button
Newsvine button

CalevPhoto

Photographing the Earth, one millimeter at a time…
Previous Post:   Next Post:

Finally calibrated my monitor!

For a long time, I felt that buying a monitor calibrator was something that I should do, but it wasn’t crucial.  When I made my recent decision to focus more on print photography than on stock, I decided that it was now necessary to get a monitor calibrator.  I decided to go with the Spyder 3 Elite  I felt that right now the ColorVision S3P100 Spyder3 pro would do what I needed, but I wanted to leave room for growth open in the future. I’ll have a more in depth review of the Spyder 3 Elite in the future, though I must say that it took some work to get it running.

When I first installed it I received an error – spyder3.cpp 297 65550 (0×10004).  I am currently running Windows Vista 64 bit and I figured they probably didn’t test against that.  However their web site states that it is compatible, so I downloaded the 3.0.4 version of the software (3.0.1 is in the box) and I still had some problems.  Then I realized that the older version was still running, so I made sure that I was running the new version and the error went away.  I then had problems getting the suction cup to stay but like the software says if you wet the suction cup slightly it sticks much better.  Finally, the software had a hard time recognizing the device.  To fix this, I just unplugged the USB cable and plugged it back in and then it recognized it.

After all that, the monitor calibrator did make a difference with my monitor.  The before and after shots definitely showed and improvement.  More important, I opened a shot that I created before I calibrated my monitor and I fixed it.

The following is a shot of a harvestman I created before.

A number of viewers had mentioned that the shot is too yellow and is a bit overexposed.  Obviously the overexposed part was not affected by monitor calibration, but I suspect the yellow tint was partially because I had previously not calibrated my monitor.  Here is the new shot after a bit of editing.

I think I like the second shot a bit better.  What do you think?

No related posts.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,





Posted in General Photography and Insects and Macro photography 2 years, 2 months ago at 7:12 am.

4 comments

4 Replies

  1. Noticed a little difference and I know that I should be getting one of these one day!

  2. Wow, that’s a pretty big difference. I definitely like the post-calibration version better.

  3. The second one is definitely better, you really pulled out more detail with it, and the color looks more natural.

  4. I had no idea how messed up my monitor had become after I upgraded to Vista until I was asked to look at some high-res photos – wow. Since I couldn’t find a good Vista tool at the time – after some research – I put together a list of simple visual tools that can help you quickly get your monitor close to calibrated. See http://www.vtoolbox.com/desktop-web-utilities/monitor_calibration/


Leave a Reply